Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1637 (GAU)

ROSKIL S MARAK v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS

WP(C)/4620/2023 · 2026-01-20

Kardak Ete

Writ Petition (Civil)body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010173072023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/4620/2023 ROSKIL S MARAK W/O- SRI RAJESH SANGMA, D/O- SMT. HEROIN S MARAK @ KHRISTANI, R/O- VILL.- RANIGHAT, P.O. HAHIM, P.S. BOKO, DIST. KAMRUP(R), ASSAM, PIN- 781129. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 5 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, DISPUR. 2:PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAND AND REVENUE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR. 3:THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF SOCIAL WELFARE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR. 4:THE SECRETARY MINISTRY OF EDUCATION ASSAM DISPUR. 5:DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (REV) KAMRUP(R) DISTRICT Page No.# 2/2 AMINGAON. 6:CIRCLE OFFICER BOKO REVENUE CIRCLE BOKO Advocate for the Petitioner : MR P K BORAH, Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, REVENUE,SC, ELEM. EDU BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 21.01.2026 None appears for the petitioner. Ms. N. Brodoloi, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue, Mr. N. Das, learned State Counsel and Ms. B. Deka, learned counsel for the respondent No.4 are present. It is noticed that on 10.11.2025, also none represented the petitioner. The grievance raised in this petition is for payment of compensation, which is alleged to have been mutated in the name of the petitioner, while the mother is alive. It appears that the petitioner is no longer interested to pursue the matter. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant