Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1630 (GAU)

JADAV BORAH AND 3 ORS. v. NARAYAN KONWAR AND 8 ORS

Cont.Cas(C)/413/2023 · 2026-02-02

Rajesh Mazumdar

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010149912023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Cont.Cas(C)/413/2023 JADAV BORAH AND 3 ORS. S/O LATE PRAFULLA BORAH, R/O VILL- NABAJYOTI GAON, P.O.-POWAI, P.S.-DIGBOI, DIST- TINSUKIA, ASSAM, PIN-786171 2: ATUL CHAMUAH S/O SRI TIKHESWAR CHAMUAH R/O VILL-POWAI NABAJYOTI GAON P.O.-POWAI P.S.-DIGBOI DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786171 3: SMTI BHANU LOH TAMANG D/O SRI SAL BAHADUR LOH R/O VILL-POWAI BON GAON P.O.-KETETONG P.S.-DIGBOI DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786171 4: SMTI MINUPROVA SAIKIA W/O SRI DHANSINGH TIMUNG R/O VILL-PHILLOBARI P.O.-CHIKORAJAN (PHILLOBARI) P.S.-PENEREE DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-78616 VERSUS NARAYAN KONWAR AND 8 ORS Page No.# 2/4 THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, EDUCATION (ELEMENTARY) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-781006 2:SMTI SURANJANA SENAPATI THE DIRECTOR OF ELEMENTARY EDUCATION ASSAM KAHILIPARA GUWAHATI-781019 3:ABDUL RAUF THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI DIST-KAMRUP (M) ASSAM PIN-781029 4:SAMIR SINHA THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-781006 5:SWAPNEEL PAUL THE DISTRICT LEVEL SCRUTINY COMMITTEE REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER TINSUKIA DIST-TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786192 6:BITUPAN HAZARIKA THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER TINSUKIA DISTRICT DIST- TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125 7:SRI K.S. GOPINATH NARAYAN THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI DISTRICT- (METRO) ASSSAM Page No.# 3/4 PIN-781029. 8:SRI JAYANT NARLIKAR THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY FINANCE DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI PIN-781006. 9:SMTI. KABITA DEKA THE DISTRICT ELEMENTARY EDUCATION OFFICER TINSUKIA DISTRICT-TINSUKIA ASSAM PIN-786125 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. B BHUYAN, MRS. R S DEURI,MS M.CHAKRABORTY,MS P.BORAH Advocate for the Respondent : MR. D SAIKIA (r-1), MR S M T CHISTIE (R-9),R M BAROOAH(R- 8),MR P NAYAK(R-8),MR. B GOGOI (R-8),MR S M T CHISTIE (r-1),MR. A PHUKAN (r-1) BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR ORDER 03.02.2026 Heard Ms. B. Bhuyan, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners assisted by Ms. R. S. Deuri, learned counsel for the petitioners. None appears for the contemnors on call. The learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners has placed before this Court a compliance report supplied to her on 30.01.2026 by the learned counsel for the contemnors. The learned Senior Counsel has submitted that the aforesaid order does not appear to be in compliance of this Court of the order dated 27.07.2022 passed in WP(C)/4755/2022. However on going through the materials, this Court is of the opinion that the respondent authorities have passed an order after due deliberation. Without commenting on the correctness or otherwise of the communication dated Page No.# 4/4 17.07.2023, this Court, as agreed to by the learned Senior Counsel for the petitioners, closes this contempt petition with a liberty to the petitioners to assail the communication dated 17.07.2023 in such manner, as may be available in law. A copy of the order dated 17.07.2023 is kept on record and marked as “X”. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant