Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1612 (PAT)

Satto Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CWJC/13177/2023 · 2026-04-07

Rajiv Roy

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13177 of 2023 ====================================================== Satto Yadav S/o late Bahadur Yadav R/V - Bhujahar, P.S.- Rosara, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. The District Magistrate Samastipur. 3. The Circle Officer, Shivaji Nagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha, AAG-9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 07-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief(s): “i. for issuance of an appropriate writ/ order/direction in nature of Mandamus commanding upon the respondents to stop constructing brick work for Waste Management on the Raiyati land of the petitioner situated at Mauza Shankarpur, thana no-41, P.S.-Rosera, District Samastipur in, Khata No- 288 (New), Khesara No- 395, 398, 397, 399 (New). ii. For granting the other relief or reliefs in accordance with law.” Patna High Court CWJC No.13177 of 2023(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/2 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that alongwith all the documents, he shall be approaching the respondent no. 2, the Collector, Samastipur for the redressal of the grievance. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it. 5. In that background, allowing the petitioner to approach the Collector, Samastipur, as recorded above, and if such petition is filed, with a direction to take the same to its logical conclusion at an earliest, the writ petition stands disposed of. Adnan/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U