IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16369 of 2023 ====================================================== Daya Shankar Prasad Sinha @ Daya Shankar Pd. Sinha Son of Late Govind Prasad Ambastha, Resident of Mohalla-Jaipur Dhanki, Agam Kuan, P.O.- Pahari, Behind Apollo Burn Hospital, Kumahrar, P.S.- Agamkuan, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through District Magistrate, Patna. 2. The Additional Collector, Patna. 3. The Deputy Collector Land Reform, Patna City. 4. The Circle Officer, Sadar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amit Narayan, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 27-04-2026 Heard Mr. Amit Narayan, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mrs. Nutan Sahay, learned AC to AAG-12 representing the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the grant of following relief(s): “against the non-compliance of the order dated 18.01.2012 passed in Mutation Appeal Nos. 05/07-08 and 12/08-09 by the court of DCLR, Patna City and the order passed by the Circle Officer, Sadar Patna on 07.12.2012 in mutation case no. 466/4 of 2012-13 for which several representation is made by the petitioner Patna High Court CWJC No.16369 of 2023(2) dt.27-04-2026 2/2 before the concerned authority to correct the jamabandi which is still established/recorded wrongly in govt. seriesta and is still established on online whose mutation has already been cancelled by order dated 18.01.2012 and 07.12.2012. After mutation of said petitioner land is not deducted from the total area recorded in khatiyan and jamabandi is established over more then 66 decimal which is error of record which should be corrected by the appropriate order of this Hon'ble court.” 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submit that he shall be approaching the Collector, Patna (respondent no.1) for the redressal of the grievance. 4. The contention of the learned State counsel is that if a proper petition with supporting annexures are filed, it will be taken to its logical conclusion. 5. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid observation. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U