IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15146 of 2023 ====================================================== Sumalati Devi Wife of Manager Bharti, resident of Village-Thepahan Station Tola, Thepahan Bazar, P.S.-Jiradei, District-Siwan. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through The Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna. 3. The Additional Chief Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna. 4. The Officer in Charge of Jiradei Police Station, District-Siwan. 5. The Superintendent of Police, District-Siwan, Bihar. 6. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, District-Siwan, Bihar. 7. The Circle Officer, Jiradei, District-Siwan. 8. Sushila Devi, Wife of Ramniwas Bharti, Resident of Village-Thepahan, P.S. Jiradei, District-Siwan. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ritesh Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Rishi Raj Sinha (Sc19) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 26-03-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the defect pointed out will be removed. 2. The present application has been preferred for the following relief(s): (A) For commanding the state respondents No. 4, 5, 6&7 to restrain the private respondent from grabbing the land of petitioner and inquire into the matter pursuant to the repre-sentation made by the petitioner on 29/11/2018 against the private respondent for grabbing the land purchased by the petitioner from his elder brother in law in 2012 through sale deed executed in the name of the petitioner. Patna High Court CWJC No.15146 of 2023(2) dt.26-03-2026 2/2 (B) For commanding the concerned state respondent authority to take legal action as well as restrain the private respond-ents from committing breach of peace on the purchased land of the petitioner. (C) Also for necessary relief order/direction for which the pe-titioner is entitled in the eye of law as well as on facts of the case. 3. Mr. Ritesh Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Vijay Singh/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U