Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1589 (GAU)

MAYA SAHA v. ABANI KUMAR DAS AND ANR.

CRP(IO)/151/2023 · 2026-03-24

Kaushik Goswami

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010107772023 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : CRP(IO)/151/2023 MAYA SAHA D/O- LATE MADAN MOHAN SAHA, W/O- SRI SUDIP SAHA, PRESENTLY RESIDING AT PANDU BARA BAZAR, GUWAHATI-781012, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM VERSUS ABANI KUMAR DAS AND ANR. S/O- LATE RATNESWAR DAS, R/O- VILL.- PADUMBARI, GUWAHATI-781011, DIST. KAMRUP(M), ASSAM 2:SMT. PUTULI BALA KUMARI W/O- LATE BIDYADHAR KUMAR R/O- VILL.- GOOTANAGAR P.S. JALUKBARI DIST. KAMRUP(M) ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R SARMA, MR D HAZARIKA,MR. S. DEY,MR A HUSSAIN Advocate for the Respondent : MS. M NATH (R-1), MR. R BARUAH (R-1),MR. A IKBAL (R-1) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 25.03.2026 Heard Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. A. Ikbal, learned counsel appearing for the sole respondent. Mr. A. Hussain, learned counsel, submits that he has received instructions not to press the present civil revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. In view of the aforesaid endorsement made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the civil revision petition stands dismissed on being withdrawn. Interim order passed earlier accordingly stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant