- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC:25846 RSA No. 632 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF JULY, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.632 OF 2020 (INJ) BETWEEN: SRI H.RAJAPPA S/O HANUMAPPA @ GIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, AGRICULTURIST, SIDDAPURA VILLAGE, CHITRADURGA TALUK & DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. GIRISH M.K., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. RATHNAMMA W/O BENAKANAHALLY, ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 2. SRI ESHWARAPPA S/O BENAKANAHALLI, ESHWARAPPA, SINCE DEAD BY LRS' 2(a) MALLIKARJUNA S/O ESHWARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS, BOTH ARE R/OF SIDDAPURA VILLAGE, CHITRADURGA TALUK & DISTRICT PIN: 577 501. …RESPONDENTS Digitally signed by THEJASKUMAR N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2023:KHC:25846 RSA No. 632 of 2020 THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF THE CPC., SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Sri.Girish.M.K., learned counsel for appellants has appeared in person. The captioned appeal is listed today for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections for fifth time. A perusal of the daily order sheet depicts that the appeal was listed before the Registrar (P & H) on several occasions and time was granted to comply office objections. As could be seen from the appeal papers, the appeal is filed in the year 2020. Now we are in the month of July 2023. It's almost been three years. So far, office objections are not complied. Learned counsel for appellants submits that short accommodation may be granted to comply office objections. Submission is noted. - 3 - NC: 2023:KHC:25846 RSA No. 632 of 2020 This Court finds no justification to grant further time for the simple reason that, despite giving several opportunities, the appellants have not instructed the counsel on record to comply office objections. Hence, the Regular Second Appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 9