SMTI. HONGTI KONYAK AND ANR v. THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS
Review.Pet./1/2023 · 2026-02-10
Michael Zothankhuma, Yarenjungla Longkumer
Review Petitionbody2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1549 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1549 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC020000992023
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : Review.Pet./1/2023 SMTI. HONGTI KONYAK AND ANR WIFE OF LATE K. TINGONG KONYAK- TENGONG-TINGONG, PONGKONG VILLAGE, MON NAGALAND2: T. PANGNYEI KONYAK S/O LATE K. TINGONG KONYAK PONGKONG VILLAGE MON NAGALAN VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND 2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND P AND AR DEPARTMENT NAGALAND KOHIMA 4:THE DIRECTOR DIRECTORATE OF HORTICULTURE NAGALAND KOHIM Advocate for the Petitioner : SUPONGWATI WALLING, R ATSULA KIPS Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL,
BEFORE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER
Page No.# 2/2 Date : 11/02/2026 M. Zothankhuma, J
Heard Mr. Supongwati Walling, learned counsel for the review petitioner, who submits that he would like to withdraw the review petition. Mr. M. Imchen, learned Senior Government Advocate, Nagaland, representing the respondent nos. 1 & 3 and Mr. Moa Jamir, learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 & 4, are present. The prayer of the review petitioner is allowed. Review petition stands dismissed on withdrawal.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant