THE MANAGER , M/W RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE v. PARASHURAM SON OF BASAIAH
MFA/102051/2015 · 2026-07-16
Geetha K B
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1520 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1520 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102051 OF 2015 (MV)
BETWEEN:
THE MANAGER , M/S RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, BALLARI, NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY, RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, BRANCH OFFICE, CTS # 172/171, V.A. KALBURGI SQUARE, DESAI CROSS, DESHPANDE NAGAR, HUBBALLI. ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S.K. KAYAKAMATH, AND SRI. HELAVAR R.S., ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
PARASHURAM SON OF BASAIAH, AGED 42 YEARS, COOLIE,
2.
SMT. LAXMI WIFE OF PARASHURAM AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS,
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF D. ANTHAPUR VILLAGE, SANDUR TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT.
3.
PEERSAB SON OF IMAM SAB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, DRIVER OF THE LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KA-34/A-4336,
2 RESIDENT OF CHAPPARADHALLI VILLAGE, (P. SANDUR TALUK, BALLARI DISTRICT.)
4.
M/S SREEHITHA CONSTRUCTIONS BY ITS MANAGER, OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING REGISTRATION NO. KA-34/A-4336, RESIDENT OF DOOR NO.45, WARD NO.21, M.V. NAGAR, KAPPAGAL ROAD, BALLARI.
... RESPONDENTS (By SHRI. M. AMAREGOUDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2, NOTICE TO R3 IS SERVED NOTICE TO R4 IS DISPENSED WITH V/O DATED 18.06.2024)
* * * * *
This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 0.04.2015, passed in MVC No.492 of 2013, on the file of the File of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal No.V, at Ballari.
This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following;
O R D E R
One week time is granted to take steps in respect of unserved respondents. Failing to do so, appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Bench. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 12.12.2023, the Advocate for appellant has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this
3 MFA No.102051 of 2015 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 10.08.2023
BY ORDER OF THE COURT
Sd/-
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR.
T By: gtb C By: sdp