IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17802 of 2023 ====================================================== Shiv Shankar Prasad S/o-Late Yogendra Prasad Singh @ Yogendra Singh, R/o-Village-Ramchandrapur (Ward No.-6), P.S.-Pipariya, District-Lakhisarai. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar through the Principle Secretary, Department of Revenue, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2. The Commissioner, Munger Division at Munger. 3. The District Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 4. The Superintendent of Police, Lakhisarai. 5. The Sub Divisional Magistrate, Lakhisarai. 6. The Circle Officer, Pipariya Block, District-Lakhisarai. 7. The Anchal Amin, Pipariya Block, District-Lakhisarai. 8. Raju Singh S/o Late Baleshwar Singh R/o- Vill- Ramchandrapur, Tola- Teenkhutti, P.S- Pipariya, Dist- Lakhisarai. 9. Deepak Singh S/o Late Baleshwar Singh R/o- Vill- Ramchandrapur, Tola- Teenkhutti, P.S- Pipariya, Dist- Lakhisarai. 10. Bhushan Singh S/o Late Baleshwar Singh R/o- Vill- Ramchandrapur, Tola- Teenkhutti, P.S- Pipariya, Dist- Lakhisarai. 11. Bidan Singh S/o Late Baleshwar Singh R/o- Vill- Ramchandrapur, Tola- Teenkhutti, P.S- Pipariya, Dist- Lakhisarai. 12. Ramnath Singh S/o Late Baleshwar Singh R/o- Vill- Ramchandrapur, Tola- Teenkhutti, P.S- Pipariya, Dist- Lakhisarai. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Onkar Nath, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr.Nagendra Prasad Yadav ( Sc 23 ) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 24-03-2026 Heard Mr.Onkar Nath, learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. 2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s: (i) commanding the respondent authorities Patna High Court CWJC No.17802 of 2023(2) dt.24-03-2026 2/3 particularly the Respondent No.-3 & 4 to ensure the compliance of the order concerning with Measurement Case No.- 15/2022-23 passed by the Respondent No.-6 (Circle Officer), Pipariya; (ii) further, commanding the respondent authorities to bring the entire records before this Hon'ble court during the adjudication of the case & matter; (iii) for grant of any other incidental/consequential relief/reliefs, for which the petitioner can be found entitled for. 3. The claim of the petitioner is that the land has been measured by appropriate revenue authorities but the possession is still eluded him. 4. Learned State counsel submits that the petitioner should have approached the competent authority/Court for the redressal of the grievance against the respondent nos. 08 to 12 who according to the petitioner are creating disturbance. 4. This Court finds force in the submission of the learned State counsel, the petitioner ought to have moved before Patna High Court CWJC No.17802 of 2023(2) dt.24-03-2026 3/3 the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Lakhisarai (respondent no.05)/the competent Court for the redressal of the grievance. 5. In that background, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the aforesaid authority so that after noticing the other side, the matter is taken to its logical conclusion. 6. Granting said liberty and expecting the concerned authority to act in accordance with law, the writ petition is disposed of. Ravi/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U