Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1494 (KAR)

SMT.LAXMIBAI W/O RAMESH WARAD ALIS VARAD v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

MFA/102128/2020 · 2026-07-15

Geetha K B

body2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF AUGUST 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102128 OF 2020 (MV-D) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. LAXMIBAI W/O RAMESH WARAD ALIAS VARAD, AGE: 29 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, 2. KUMARI RAKSHITHA D/O RAMESH WARAD ALIAS VARAD, AGE: 10 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, 3. KUMARI RANJITHA D/O RAMESH WARAD ALIAS VARAD, AGE: 9 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, 4. KUMAR KARTIK S/O RAMESH WARAD ALIAS VARAD, AGE: 8 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, 5. KUMARI KAVYA D/O RAMESH WARAD ALIAS VARAD, AGE: 8 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT, (APPELLANTS NOS.2 TO 5 ARE MINORS REPRESENTED BY M/G MOTHER APPELLANT NO.1) 6. SMT. SAVAKKA W/O MALLAPPA WARAD @ VARAD, AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD, ALL ARE R/O: RANTUR, TQ: SHIRAHATTI, DIST: GADAG, NOW AT HUBBALLI. 2 (SINCE THE PETITIONER NO.7 IN MVC.NO.994/2015 IS NOT MADE AS A PARTY TO THE PRESENT APPEAL AS HE IS DEAD) …APPELLANTS (BY SRI.CHANDRASHEKHAR.M.HOSAMANI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NWKRTC, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI- 580010. 2. SELF INSURANCE FUND, NWKRTC, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI- 580010. 3. IRAYYA S/O BHIKSHAYYA SALIMATH, AGE: MAJOR, OCC: ELECTRICAL CONTRACTOR, AND OWNER OF THE TATA ACE VEHICLE, R/O: SOMESHWAR NAGAR, MUKTIMANDIR ROAD, LAXMESHWAR, TQ: SHIRAHATTI- 582116, DIST: GADAG. 4. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, ENKAY COMPLEX, KESHWAPUR, HUBBALLI- 580023, (POLICY NO. 471101/31/2016/1258) ... RESPONDENTS ******** This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 27TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2017 passed in MVC No.994/2015 on the file of the I Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional MACT, Hubballi, at Hubballi. 3 This appeal coming on for orders this day, the Hon’ble Court passed the following; O R D E R Two weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE //COPY// As per the endorsement made in the order sheet dated 17.01.2024, the Advocate for appellants has not complied the office objections. Hence, this MFA No.102128 of 2020 stands dismissed as per the Court order dated 07.08.2023. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. T By: gtb C By: gsm