Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1484 (KAR)

SHRI.MAHESH KADAPPA KOTI v. SHRI.IQBAL HALINGALI

CRL.A/100095/2020 · 2026-06-25

Anant Ramanath Hegde

Criminal Appealbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2023:KHC-D:12168 CRL.A No. 100095 of 2020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.100095 OF 2020 (A-) BETWEEN: SHRI. MAHESH KADAPPA KOTI, AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: SHIROL, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. HARSHAWARDHAN M. PATIL, ADVOCATE) AND: SHRI. IQBAL HALINGALI, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: P.D. BUDNI, MAHALINGAPUR, TQ: MUDHOL, DIST: BAGALKOT. …RESPONDENT THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED U/S 378 (4) OF CR.P.C., PRAYING TO ALLOW THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, MUDHOL DATED 06/12/2019 PASSED IN C.C.NO.574/2017 BY REMANDING THE MATTER FOR FRESH DISPOSAL OF THE COMPLAINT ON MERITS. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Digitally signed by VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI Date: 2023.10.13 15:28:54 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2023:KHC-D:12168 CRL.A No. 100095 of 2020 ORDER Appellant’s counsel is absent. Office objections have not been complied inspite of giving sufficient time. For the 6th time the matter is being posted before the Court. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE EM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8