Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2023 DAILYLAW 1439 (KAR)

SHRI. SMT. LALITA W/O MALLESHI KUMABARKOPPA v. SMT. PARASHURAM S/O KEDAR JAVALEKAR

RFA/100650/2022 · 2026-02-26

K Manmadha Rao

Original Suitbody2023

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE.HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR RFA NO 100650 OF 2022(PAR/POS) BETWEEN 1 . SMT. LALITA W/O MALLESHI KUMBARKOPPA AGE. 59 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KAKKERI VILLAGAE, TQ. KHANAPUR DIST. BELAGAVI AND OTHERS APPELLANTS (By Sri. GURULINGESWAR G GADAG, Advocate ) AND 1 . SHRI. PARASHURAM S/O KEDAR JAVALEKAR AGE. 79 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. DESAI GALLI, HALIYAL TQ. HALIYAL DIST. UTTARA KANNADA AND OTHERS ... RESPONDENTS RFA FILED UNDER SECTION 96 READ WITH XLI RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.11.2021 PASSED IN O.S.NO.21/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE HALIYAL, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION AND DECLARATION. 2 THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING; O R D E R Four weeks time is granted to comply with the office objections. Failing to do so, the appeal stands dismissed without reference to the Court. SD/- JUDGE Note:- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 08.01.2024. The advocates for the appellant have not complied with the office objections at SI No.1 to 10. Hence, this RFA No.100650/2022 stands dismissed without reference to the Court as per the Court Order dated 21.11.2023. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR. C- By:- T- By: -ran