LATABEN TULSIBHAI PATEL (GOTI) v. BALUBHAI NATHUBHAI PATEL
CA/1322/2023 · 2026-06-11
Ilesh J Vora, R T Vachhani
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1240 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1240 (GUJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
C/CA/1322/2023 ORDER DATED: 11/06/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 1322 of 2023 In F/MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION/26216/2023 In F/FIRST APPEAL/25111/2020 ========================================= LATABEN TULSIBHAI PATEL (GOTI) Versus BALUBHAI NATHUBHAI PATEL & ORS. ========================================= Appearance: MR UDAYAN P VYAS(1302) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 MR AMIT V THAKKAR(3073) for the Respondent(s) No. 15,16 MS. KRUTI M SHAH(2428) for the Respondent(s) No. 10,11,2,5,8,9 RULE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 12,13,14,6,7 UNSERVED EXPIRED (R) for the Respondent(s) No. 1,3,4 ========================================= CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Date : 11/06/2026 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)
1. By this application, the applicant has prayed for condonation of delay as mentioned in the application in preferring civil application.
2. Having heard learned counsel for the respective parties and considering the averments made in the application, the applicant has established sufficient cause and therefore, delay in preferring the civil application deserves to be condoned and is hereby condoned.
3. Accordingly, the present application is allowed in above terms. Mr. Vyas has submitted that some of the respondents are expired and the formality for bringing heirs of the deceased respondent are still in a way.
(ILESH J. VORA,J) (R. T. VACHHANI, J) Kaushal Rathod Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: KAUSHAL MAHESHBHAI RATHOD(HCD0078), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 11/06/2026 15:02:36