Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 42
Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
FAO No. 12/2023 CM No. (3406/2023) Hilal Ahmad Gilkar …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. Vijay Kumar Dhar And Anr. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Hakim Suhail Ishtiyaq, Advocate vice Mr. Sajad Ahmad Sofi, Advocate
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 07.09.2026
1. On the last date of hearing there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the matter was called nobody turned up to represent the petitioner, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter any further.
2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution along with all connected CMs.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 07.09.2026 Akhil Dev