ASHIQ HUSSAIN YATOO v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/3393/2023 · 2026-09-07
Sanjay Parihar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1233 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1233 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 46
Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) No. 3393/2023 CM No. (8186/2023) Ashiq Hussain Yatoo …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None Vs. Union Territory of J&K And Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Amtul Basit Deva, Panel Lawyer HCLSA
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
ORDER 07.09.2026
1. For the last two consecutive hearings there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, when the matter was called nobody turned up to represent the petitioner, which suggests that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter any further.
2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed for want of prosecution along with all connected CMs.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY PARIHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 07.09.2026 Akhil Dev