SAJAD AHMAD BHAT v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
CRM(M)/169/2023 · 2026-08-21
Shahzad Azeem
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1205 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1205 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 23
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 169/2023 CrlM(413/2023) SAJAD AHMAD BHAT …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None. Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ANR. ...Respondent(s) Through: None. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
O R D E R 21.08.2026 For the last two consecutive dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Today also, neither the petitioner nor his counsel is present. It seems that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the case. In view of above, petition is dismissed in default and for non- prosecution.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 21.08.2026 Ishaq