MANZOOR AHMAD WANI v. MOHAMMAD AYOUB AND ANR ORS (FOREST)
CCP(S)/242/2023 · 2026-08-18
Shahzad Azeem
Contempt Petitionbody2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1203 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1203 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 31
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(S) 242/2023 in[SWP 127/2017] MANZOOR AHMAD WANI …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Mir Umar, Advocate. Vs.
MOHAMMAD AYOUB AND ANR ORS ...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nowbahar Khan, Assisting Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
O R D E R 18.08.2026 In compliance to the judgement passed by the Court in SWP No.127/2017 dated 07.02.2017, the case of the petitioner was considered by the respondents and same was rejected vide order dated 20.03.2017.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that rejection order was never communicated to the petitioner. Be that as it may. Nothing remains to be adjudicated upon in this contempt petition. Accordingly, contempt proceedings are closed and contempt petition is
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to challenge the rejection order dated 20.03.2017, if so advised.
Disposed of.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 18.08.2026 Ishaq
Isaq Hameed Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 18.08.26