HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: WP(C) No. 1009/2023 Harman Chand and Ors. ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- None. Vs Union of India and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- Mr. Suneel Malhotra, GA for R- 1 to 4 Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Karan Sharma, CGSC for R-5 Mr. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG for R-6 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 15.07.2026 Record reveals that vide order dated 21.04.2026, learned counsel for the petitioners was granted time to make table amendment at para No. 2 of the application bearing CM No 5364/2025. The said order was not complied with and, accordingly, this Court, vide order dated 18.05.2026, granted further three weeks’ time to comply with the aforesaid order. The said order has not been complied with till date and, even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition which is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 15.07.2026 Mihul Sr. No. 18