AALAM BI AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH SSP RAJOURI AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/929/2023 · 2026-07-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1037 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1037 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Case: CRM(M) No. 929/2023
Aalam Bi and Ors.
..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through :- Mr. Satinder Gupta, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s)
Through :- Mr. Bhanu Jasrotia, GA Mr. K.S. Puri, Advocate
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.07.2026
Record reveals that none has appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 02.12.2023, 18.09.2024 and 30.12.2024. Thereafter, none appeared on behalf of the petitioners even on the last date of hearing, i.e., 16.02.2026. The position remains the same today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution along with all connected application(s). Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL)
JUDGE
JAMMU 07.07.2026 Mihul
Sr. No. 20