MUZAFFAR AHMAD MALIK AND OTHERS v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
CRM(M)/263/2023 · 2026-07-03
Shahzad Azeem
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1033 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1033 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 30
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 263/2023 CrlM(653/2023) MUZAFFAR AHMAD MALIK AND OTHERS …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None. Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND OTHERS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. T. A. Lone, Dy.AG vice Mr. Faheem Shah, GA. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE
O R D E R 03.07.2026 For the last five dates of hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Today also neither the petitioners nor their counsel is present. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed in default and for non- prosecution.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 03.07.2026 Ishaq