LAKSHMAN SINGH v. UT OF J AND K TH SECRETARY TO GOVT JAL SHAKTI DEPARTMENT JAMMU AND ORS
WP(C)/79/2023 · 2026-07-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1032 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1032 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 79/2023
Lakshman Singh …..Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Ms. Priyanka Bhat, Advocate vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG
Coram:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER (03.07.2026)
01. Record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 16.12.2023 and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting of the instant petition.
02. Dismissed for non prosecution.
03. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU
03.07.2026
Vijay
S. No. 29 Vijay Kumar 2026.07.04 12.05 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document