PRASANTA KUMAR MOHANTY v. MADHUSMITA DAS @ MOHANTY
RPFAM/365/2023 · 2026-08-29
Sanjay Kumar Mishra
body2023
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1005 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2023 DAILYLAW 1005 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
RPFAM No.365 of 2023
CNR No. ODHC010875502023
Prasanta Kumar Mohanty …. Petitioner
None -versus- Madhusmita Das @ Mohanty …. Opposite Party
CORAM: JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA
Order No.
ORDER 29.08.2026
02.
This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2.
Learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on call.
3. Though the revision petition was presented on 31.10.2023, and the Stamp Reporting was made on 04.11.2023, indicating therein that the prayers made in the present revision petition should be confined to one prayer, no step has been taken till date in the said regard. For the said reason, no stamp reporting could be made. Since no step was taken in terms of the Stamp Reporting, the matter got listed before the Bench on 16.01.2024, on which date, the co-ordinate Bench directed the Petitioner to remove the defects within seven days. p. 2
3.1. Despite such Judicial order, defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter are yet to be removed. That apart, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is absent on call.
4. Accordingly, the revision petition stands dismissed for non-taking of steps, as pointed out by the Stamp Reporter, so also direction of the coordinate Bench and for non-prosecution.
5. Office is directed to communicate a copy of this
order to the Opposite Party for her information and necessary action.
Prasant
(S.K. MISHRA) JUDGE
Designation: Secretary