IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO No.85 of 2022 Date of decision:09.07.2026 Nareshwer Singh Chandel & another ...Petitioners. Versus Ram Krishan ...Respondent. Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Aman Sood, Advocate. For the respondent : Ms. Anu Tuli Azta, Advocate. Romesh Verma, Judge (oral): It is contended by Mr. Aman Sood, learned counsel for the petitioners, that the learned trial Court has already confirmed the ad interim injunction order on 04.09.2024. He submits that in view of the passing of injunction order in favour of the petitioners, the present petition has become infructuous with the passage of time. However, he further submits that the parties shall remain bound by the said injunction order and any violation of the same shall be construed to be the contempt of the Court. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 2. In view of the submissions as made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the present petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous along with pending application(s), if any. (Romesh Verma) Judge 9th July, 2026. (vt)