IRSHAD AHMAD HAKIM v. UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION MAHRAJ GUNJ AND ORS. (HOME DEPARTMENT)
CRM(M)/28/2022 · 2026-07-10
Sanjay Dhar
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 989 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 989 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 36
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CRM(M) 28/2022 CrlM(109/2022)
IRSHAD AHMAD HAKIM …Petitioner(s)/appellant(s) Through: None
Vs.
UNION TERRITORY AND ORS
...Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Maha Majeed, Assisting Counsel
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE
O R D E R 10-07-2026
None for the petitioner. On the last date of hearing also, nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the respondents has submitted that the challan in the impugned FIR stands already filed before the trial court.
It appears that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the petition. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Interim direction shall stand vacated.
(SANJAY DHAR)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 10th July, 2026 Aamir