ASHAQ ALI HAJAM AND ORS. v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/2276/2022 · 2026-07-03
Shahzad Azeem
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 978 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 978 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 119 Supplementary List-II
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C (2276/2022) CM (5691/2022) Ashaq Ali Hajam & Others. …Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs. Union Territory of J&K and Others.
...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Jahangir Ahmad Dar, GA.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE.
ORDER 03.07.2026 The learned counsel for the respondents submits that in view of the law laid down by the Division Bench of this Court in case titled “Ghulam Nabi Bhat & Ors vs State of J&K and Ors”, bearing LPA No. 13/2022, the petitioner has no legal right to seek a writ of mandamus, in that, the issue involved in this petition has already been dealt with by the Division Bench of this Court. It is further submitted that the said judgment was also relied upon by a Coordinate Bench in “WP(C) 2824/2022” titled “Shahid Mehraj vs Union Territory of J&K and Ors.” Copies of both judgments are taken on record. Be that as it may, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant case. Accordingly, the instant writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution, along with connected application(s).
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 03.07.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 03.07.2026