MADAN MOHAN GUPTA v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH INCHARGE POLICE STATION VIGIL ORGANIZATION JAMMU AND ORS
CRM(M)/743/2021 · 2026-07-02
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 972 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 972 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM (M) No. 40/2022
Vijay Kumar Gandotra …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Satinder Gupta, Advocate
Vs
U.T. of J&K .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG (Sr. Advocate) with Ms. Jagmeet Kour, Assisting Counsel Ms. Pallavi, Sr. Prosecuting Officer ACB
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 02.07.2026
1. After arguing for a while, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to pursue the matter before the Court of learned Special Judge, Anti- Corruption, Udhampur, where the challan in the instant matter has been filed and the trial is going on at presently. His statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 02.07.2026 Nikhil
Sr. No. 07