SURAYA BEGUM AND OTHERS v. ABDUL KHALIQ AND OTHERS
CM(M)/89/2022 · 2026-07-03
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 971 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 971 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CM (M) No. 89/2022
Suraya Begum and others …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Roop Lal, Advocate
Vs
Abdul Khaliq and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Mohd. Arif, Advocate
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 03.07.2026
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission to withdraw the instant petition in view of the latest development, submitting that the petitioners do not wish to pursue the matter any further. His statement is taken on record.
2. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 03.07.2026 Nikhil
Sr. No. 19