Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2022 DAILYLAW 968 (ORI)

SACHITRA PARIDA v. STATE OF ODISHA

CRLMC/3577/2022 · 2026-05-07

Miss Savitri Ratho

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CRLMC No. 3577 of 2022 Sachitra Parida …. Petitioner Mr. Arijeet Mishra, Advocate -versus- 1. State of Odisha 2. Smt. Sudipa Nayak …. Opposite Parties Mr. Sarathi Jyoti Mohanty, Additional Government Advocate CORAM: THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO Order No. ORDER 07.05.2026 04. (Through hybrid mode) 1. This CRLMC has been filed to quash the order of framing charge as well as the criminal proceeding in G.R. Case No.1962 of 2014 pending in the Court of learned Asst. Sessions Judge (STC), Cuttack which arises out of Cuttack Mahila P.S. Case No.166 of 2014. 2. On 30.11.2022, notice had been issued to the Opposite Party No.2 and further proceeding in the case had been directed to remain stayed. As notice could not be served on Opposite Party No.2, on 06.01.2023 fresh notice had been directed to be issued to the Opposite Party No.2 and interim order had been extended. Office has pointed out that fresh requisites for issue of notice to Opposite Party No.2 with present correct address has not yet been filed. 3. On 01.11.2023 in I.A. No. 3279 of 2023 this Court had stayed the further proceeding in ST Case No.67 of 2015 pending in the file of learned Assistant Sessions Judge (STC) Cuttack, arising out of Cuttack Mahila P.S. Case No.166 of 2014 as well as the operation of the order dated 09.10.2023 till the next date. 4. Mr. Arijeet Mishra, learned counsel for the Petitioner has filed a memo stating that as Opposite Party No.2 is not appearing in the case and the new address of Opposite Party No.2 is not available with the Petitioner, he may be permitted to withdraw the case. 5. Considering the said memo, the CRLMC is dismissed as withdrawn. 6. The Petitioner is granted two weeks time to revive / restore the case, if he obtains the correct address of the Opposite Party No.2. 7. Interim orders passed earlier stand vacated. The interim applications stand disposed of. 8. Perused the letter dated 05.08.2025 of the ASJ (STC), Cuttack who has informed that this case has been targeted for disposal in Phase-IV of APAaR-DJ and is the oldest case pending in his file. 9. Copy of this order be communicated by the Registry to the learned Assistant Sessions Judge (STC), Cuttack in S.T. No.67 of 2015, to enable the Court to proceed with the trial of the case. (Savitri Ratho) Judge RKS