IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.217 of 2022 Gobinda Chandra Dash …. Petitioner Mr. H.P. Rath, Advocate -versus- Sunanda Dash @ Mishra & another …. Opp. Parties Ms. Susamarani Sahoo, Advocate Mr. R.K. Tripathy, Advocate CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 15.04.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 04. 1. The matter is listed for orders indicating in the cause list that defect pointed out by the Stamp Report has not been removed. 2. The matter was presented before this Court on 12.09.2022. After three years, it was listed for removal of defects before the learned Deputy Registrar (Judicial), Lawzima for removal of defects and three weeks’ time was granted for removal of defects. 3. Thereafter, the matter was listed before this Bench on 11.03.2026, none appeared for the petitioner on repeated calls, granting further opportunity to remove the defects as pointed by the Stamp Report, ten days’ time was granted. Despite giving sufficient indulgence, the matter is not prosecuted by the petitioner. 4. As directed by order dated 30.03.2026, the efforts of the Registry to intimate the learned counsel for the petitioner has yielded result. The learned counsel for the petitioner is present. 5. The matter being in the list is mentioned by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He files memo of date which states thus: “Talk of compromise is going on between the parties. In order to have a healthy progress in the talk, the petitioner do not want to proceed with this case and as such prays for withdrawal of this case. The petitioner may kindly be permitted to withdraw this petition.” The memo is taken on record. 6. Accordingly, the revision application is disposed of. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Radha