1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA RSA No. : 112 of 2022 & RSA No.165 of 2023 Decided on : 23.04.2026 RSA No. 112 of 2022 Sunpa Devi ….Appellant. Versus Yog Raj (since deceased) through LRs & Ors. ...Respondents RSA No. 165 of 2023 Yog Raj (since deceased) through LRs & Ors. Versus Sunpa Devi & Ors. ….Respondents _________________________________ Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma. Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the appellant Mr. Sudhir Thakur, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Karun Negi, Advocate,for the appellant in RSA No.112 of 2022 and for respondent No.1 in RSA No. 165 of 2023. For the respondents Ms. Kanchan Singh, Advocate, for respondents N. 1(a) and 1(b) in RSA No. 112 of 2022 and for the appellants in RSA No. 165 of 2023 __________________________________________ 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Romesh Verma, Judge(oral) In pursuance to the directions of this Court, Mr. Rajeev Ranta, Tehsildar, Solan is present in the Court and he has placed on record a photocopy of the sale deed. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the parties that, during the pendency of the appeal(s), the parties to the lis have compromised the matter, and the necessary sale deed has been duly registered. Therefore, they, on instructions, pray for and are granted permission to withdraw the respective appeals. In view of the above, the present appeals are dismissed as withdrawn and are, accordingly, disposed of. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (Romesh Verma) Judge 23rd April 2026 (veena)