KULSUMA AKHTER v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE DEPARTMENT)
RP/24/2021 · 2026-05-29
Sanjay Dhar, Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Review Petitionbody2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 938 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 938 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH ATSRINAGAR (Through Virtual Mode)
CM No.2458/2022 in RP No.24/2021
Kulsuma Akhter .....Appellant/Petitioner(s)
Through :- Mr. Yahya, Advocate vice Mr. R. A. Jan, Sr. Advocate
v/s Union Territory of J&K and others .....Respondent(s)
Through :- None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 29.05.2026
Learned counsel for the review petitioner submits that he has no instructions in the matter and it seems that the review petitioner is not interested to pursue the present review petition. His statement is taken on record. In view of the above, the review petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) (Sanjay Dhar) Judge Judge
JAMMU 29.05.2026 Shammi
Sr. No. 03