MUSHTAQ AHMAD BHAT v. JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED AND ANR.
WP(C)/2943/2022 · 2026-05-21
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 928 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 928 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2943/2022 CM(7387/2022).
MUSHTAQ AHMAD BHAT.
…Petitioner(s)
Through: None.
VERSUS
JAMMU AND KASHMIR BANK LIMITED AND ANR.
…Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Waseem Gul, GA. Ms. Aneesa, Advocate vice Mr. N. A. Dendru, Advocate.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL , JUDGE.
ORDER 21.05.2026
01. The record reveals that there has been no representation on behalf of the petitioner on the last two dates of hearing and the same position prevails today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner has lost interest in prosecuting the instant matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
02. Interim direction(s), if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL )
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 21.05.2026 Bisma Jan.
09 Regular