MUSHTAQ AHMED v. UNION TERRITORY OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR TH SECRETARY FCS AND CA DEPTT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/287/2022 · 2026-05-11
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 920 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 920 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
WP(C) No. 287/2022
Mushtaq Ahmed …..Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Mohd. Qayoom, Advocate.
Vs
UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Dewakar Sharma, Dy. AG.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
ORDER (11.05.2026)
The failure to deposit costs of Rs. 500/- by the petitioner leaves no option to this Court except to keep the writ petition in a state of dismissal for non-prosecution by reference to order dated
18.07.2025.
(RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU
11.05.2026
Shivalee
Regular List Serial No. 72 Shivalee Khajuria 2026.05.13 17:34 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document