IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.3219 of 2022 Decided on: 18th March, 2026 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Yoginder Chand Khanna …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Atharv Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Ms. Seema Sharma, Deputy Advocate General, for respondents No.1 to 4. Mr. Mukul Sood, Advocate, for respondent No.5. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that due to intervening developments, the petitioner is not interested to pursue the matter any further, therefore, this writ petition be permitted to be withdrawn. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn alongwith pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua March 18, 2026 Judge Mukesh 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes.