Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2022 DAILYLAW 912 (ORI)

UMAKANTA SAHOO v. BASANTILATA SAHOO

RPFAM/338/2022 · 2026-02-09

M S Sahoo

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No. 338 of 2022 Umakanta Sahoo …. Petitioner Mr. B.K. Dash, Advocate -versus- Basantilata Sahu @ Smt. Basantilata Sahoo …. Opposite Party CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 09.02.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 01. 1. Memo of date is filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner which reads thus : MEMO “It is to most humbly submit before this Hon’ble Court that the learned Counsel for the petitioner has no instruction from the petitioner, hence the learned Counsel don’t want to praise the above stated case.”(sic) The memo is taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. 2. The petition was filed in the year 2022. Defects were directed to be removed by order dated 31.10.2025. Thereafter it has been adjourned. The petitioner-husband in the marriage has approached this Court by filing the petition for setting aside the impugned judgment dated 04.11.2022 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court, Bhadrak in Criminal Proceeding No. 192 of 2017. By the said judgment dated 04.11.2022 the learned Judge, Family Court has allowed the petition filed by the wife in the marriage under Section 125, Cr.P.C.(since repealed and replaced by pari materia provision under section 144 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023). 3. In view of the memo filed today, the petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order shall be forwarded to the learned Judge, Family Court to be kept in the records of Criminal Proceeding No. 192 of 2017 disposed of on 04.11.2022. 4. The petition is disposed of. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge dutta