RAJAPATI PRADHAN v. SITARAM BHOI,TAHASILDAR,JHARBANDH
CONTC/7178/2022 · 2026-02-06
K R Mohapatra
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 902 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 902 (ORI) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK CONTC No.7178 of 2022
Rajapati Pradhan …. Petitioner Mr.Udipta Kumar Panda, Advocate appearing on behalf of Mr. Gokulananda Sahu, Advocate -versus- Sitaram Bhoi, Tahasildar, Jharbandh …. Opp. Parties
Mr. Swayambhu Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
ORDER
Order No. 06.02.2026
02.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Petitioner, in this CONTC, alleges non-compliance of
order dated 25th April, 2022 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.6777 of 2022. This Court while disposing of the writ petition directed the Tahasildar, Jharbandh to take steps to comply with order dated 6th October, 2025 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Settlement and Consolidation, Sambalpur in R.P. Case No.1817 of 2014 within a period of six months from the date of production of certified copy of the said order.
3. Mr. Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel produces a copy of the written instruction imparted by the Tahasildar, Jharbandh stating that the RoR in respect of the case land has already been corrected in the name of the Petitioner, namely, Rajapati Pradhan.
3.1. A copy of the said RoR is also enclosed to the written instruction. The copy of the written instruction so filed is taken on record.
4. In view of the above, the CONTC is disposed of with an observation that the Tahasildar, Jharbandh should supply the copy of the corrected RoR to the Petitioner within a period of three weeks hence.
5. Mr. Mishra, learned Additional Standing Counsel undertakes to communicate this order.
6. The CONTC is disposed of accordingly.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
Himansu