IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CMPMO Nos. 55 of 2022 Date of decision : 01.04.2026. Jaan Mohammad & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus Hem Raj & Ors. ...Respondents Coram: The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Romesh Verma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioners : Mr. Tara Singh Chauhan, Senior Advocate,with Mr. Surya Chauhan, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate, for respondents No. 1,2,4 and 5. Respondents No.3,6 to 10 proceeded against ex-parte vide order dated 04.11.2022 ________________________________________ Romesh Verma, Judge Heard for some time. 2. The present petition arises out of the judgment dated 26.02.2022, as passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sundernagar,District Mandi, H.P., whereby the appeal preferred by the present petitioners/plainti6s under the provisions of Order XLIII Rule 1 CP.C was dismissed and order dated 30.11.2021, passed by the learned Civil Judge, Court No.2 at Sundernagar, Mandi, H.P. was a:rmed, whereby the application ;led by the plainti6s/petitioners was ordered to be dismissed. 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? -2- 3. During the course of arguments, it is contended by the learned Senior counsel for the plainti6s/petitioners that his client shall be satis;ed in case learned trial Court is directed to decide the suit in hand within a time bound manner. 4. To his submissions, Mr. Janesh Gupta, Advocate has no objection. 5. Consequently, without touching the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed o6 by directing the learned trial Court to decide the suit in hand on or before 30.11.2026. 6. Parties are directed to appear before the Court of Civil Judge, Court No.2 at Sundernagar, Mandi, H.P. on 21.04.2025. Pending application(s), if any also stands disposed o6. (Romesh Verma) 1st April 2026 Judge (Veena)