Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2022 DAILYLAW 882 (ORI)

DEBARAJ PATRA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/4087/2022 · 2026-01-27

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 4087 of 2022 Debaraj Patra ..... Petitioner Mr. S. Mallik, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 27.01.2026 Order No. 07 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances the petitioner humbly prays that this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased to; i) Direct/order that the petitioner’s services shall be regularized at least before the date of retirement and allow him pension and post retirement benefit after retirement. ii) Pass such other order(s)/direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bonafide interest of justice. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 1 by enclosing all the relevant Page 2 of 2. documents and citations in support of her claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 1 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 1 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti