UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION RAJBAGH (HOME DEPARTMENT) (NIA) v. SHOWKAT AHMAD KHAN AND ORS.
CrlA(D)/41/2022 · 2026-04-20
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 879 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 879 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 13 REGULAR LIST
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CrlA(D) 41/2022 UNION TERRITORY THROUGH POLICE STATION RAJBAGH …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Mohsin Qadri, Sr. AAG with Mr. Faheem Shah, GA Vs.
SHOWKAT AHMAD KHAN AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: None CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE ORDE R 20.04.2026
1. Impugned in this appeal filed by the UT of J&K is an order dated 28th May, 2022 passed by the Special Judge, Designated Court under the NIA Act (Srinagar) [“the trial court”] in case titled “State of JK Vs. Showkat Ahmad Khan & Ors.”, whereby the trial court has granted bail to the respondents in FIR No. 73/2018 under Sections 13/18/20/38/39 of the UA P Act, 395/120B RPC, 7/25 Arms Act, 30 Police Act, r/w 3 PEPO.
2. The impugned order of bail was passed by the trial court on 28th May, 2022. Almost four years have been passed, and there is no complaint by the prosecution that the respondents, being on bail, have either jumped the bail or in any manner hampered or interfered with the trial. It has submitted that the respondents have been cooperating in the trial and the prosecution has so far recorded the statements of 12 out of 22 witnesses.
3. In that view of the matter, we do not deem it a fit case to interfere with the order of grant of bail in favour of the respondents, which is impugned before us in this appeal. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 20.04.2026
“ARIF” Arif Hameed I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 22.04.26