Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2022 DAILYLAW 876 (ORI)

ABINASH MALLIK v. INDUPRAVA MALLIK

RPFAM/162/2022 · 2026-04-10

M S Sahoo

body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.162 of 2022 Abinash Mallik …. Petitioner Mr. Shaik Abdul Nayeem, Advocate -versus- Induprava Mallik …. Opp. Party CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 10.04.2026 04. 1. The matter was passed over when it reached and is called again after resumption of the proceeding of the Court post lunch. Learned counsel for the petitioner is present and heard. 2. The petition was presented before this Court on 27.07.2022. After Stamp Reporting was made on 01.08.2022, it was indicated that certified copy of the impugned judgment was not filed. For removal of defects, it was listed before the learned Deputy Registrar(Judicial), Lawzima on 24.10.2025, when three weeks’ time was granted for removal of defects. Thereafter it was listed on 02.02.2026 and 10.03.2026, when no one had appeared. As directed by order dated 10.03.2026, the order along with the date of listing was intimated by the Registry with office cost through the office of Secretary, Orissa High Court Bar Association to the learned counsel for the petitioner by Speed Post. The efforts of the Registry has yielded results. The learned counsel for the petitioner appears and files memo which states thus: “The above case has been taken away by the petitioner with consent from the advocate.” Memo shall be taken on record. Scanned copy be updated. 4. Apparently, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 5. The petition stands disposed of. Copy of this order shall be forwarded to the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack to be kept in the records of Cr.P. No.26 of 2015 decided by judgment dated 10.06.2022. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Radha