M/S KHALSA JEWELLERS TH JOGINDER SINGH v. PARMOD KUMAR
Crl LP(S)/25/2022 · 2026-04-20
Rajesh Sekhri
Criminal Appealbody2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 867 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 867 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
Crl LP(S) No. 25/2022
M/s Khalsa Jewellers
….. Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Sandeep Singh, Advocate. q
vs
Parmod Kumar .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Ravinder Sharma, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rahul Sharma, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 20.04.2026
01. Mr. Sandeep Singh, learned counsel for appellant has produced copy of a recent pronouncement of Hon’ble Supreme Court in “M/s Celestium Financial vs. A. Gnanasekaran etc.” in a criminal appeal arising out of SLP (Crl.) Nos. 137-139/2025 dated 08.04.2025, whereby it has been held that a victim/complainant of an offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act can prefer an appeal against an order of acquittal without seeking special leave to appeal from the High Court.
02. Mr. Ravinder Sharma, learned Sr. Advocate has fairly conceded the legal position. Hence, present application for leave to appeal is
disposed of, in the light of pronouncement of Hon’ble Supreme Court.
03. Registry to diarize the appeal.
04. Send for scanned record from the Court of learned Special Mobile Magistrate Passenger Tax, Jammu.
05. List on 15.05.2026.
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 20.04.2026 Sushant
Sr. No. 15