SANJEEV BHASIN AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH SHO POLICE STATION WOMEN CELL DODA AND ANOTHER
CRM(M)/760/2022 · 2026-04-20
Rajesh Sekhri
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 866 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 866 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 760/2022
202
Sanjeev Bhasin & Ors.
…..Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s)
Through: Mr. Pawan K Kundal, Advocate.
q
vs
UT of J&K & Anr. .….Respondent(s)
Through: None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE
ORDER 20.04.2026
01. Statements of the petitioners no. 1 and 2 and private respondent/complainant, at whose instance impugned FIR No 29/2022 came to be registered, have been reduced into writing before learned Registrar Judicial of this Court.
02. The complainant has stated that she has amicably resolved all disputes and issues with the petitioners and has no objection to the quashment of impugned FIR.
03. Petitioners have been identified by their counsel and respondent has been identified by her father, Joginder Singh Thakur.
04. In view of the above, present petition is allowed and impugned FIR is quashed.
05.
Disposed of along with connected application(s).
(Rajesh Sekhri)
Judge
Jammu 20.04.2026 Abinash
105