HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(S) No. 154/2022 In WP(C) No. 201/2021 Jasbir Kumar …..Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Sourabh Gupta, Advocate vice Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate. Vs Dilbagh Singh .….Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Nazia Fazal, Assisting Counsel vice Mrs. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE ORDER (08.04.2026) 01. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in view of the development which has taken place during the pendency of the present contempt petition, the same is rendered infructuous but nevertheless the petitioner is entitled to avail remedy available under law to seek redressal of his grievance. As such, the petition is dismissed as infructuous with liberty granted to resort to appropriate course of legal remedy. 02. Interim direction, if any, shall stands vacated. (RAHUL BHARTI) JUDGE JAMMU 08.04.2026 Bunty Serial No. 43 Regular List Bunty Kumar 2026.04.15 11:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document