Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2022 DAILYLAW 844 (JK)

AMJAD HUSSAIN AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH PRINCIPLE SECRETARY PDD AND OTHERS

WP(C)/2706/2022 · 2026-02-03

Sanjay Dhar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU WP(C) No. 2706/2022 c/w CCP(S) No. 101/2023 Amjad Hussain & Ors. …..Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs UT of J&K & Ors. .….Respondent(s) Through: Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Assisting Counsel vice Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE ORDER (03.02.2026) WP(C) No. 2706/2022 01. None for the petitioners. 02. On the last date of hearing also, nobody had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It seems that the petitioners have lost interest in prosecuting the present writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed for non-prosecution along with connected application(s). CCP(S) No. 101/2023 03. The present petition has been filed seeking implementation of interim order dated 16.12.2022, whereby the Serial No. 47 Regular List 2 WP(C) No. 2706/2022 c/w CCP(S) No. 101/2023 respondents were directed to accord consideration to the release of pending wages of the petitioners. 04. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that wages, due to the petitioners, have already been released in their favour. In any case, since the main writ petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution, as such, interim order dated 16.12.2022 stands vacated. Thus, contempt proceedings do not survive and are closed accordingly. 05. Disposed of. (SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 03.02.2026 Bunty Bunty Kumar 2026.02.03 18:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document