Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 23852 of 2022 Truptimayee Pattanaik ..... Petitioner Mr. D.R. Bhokta, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC Mr. M.R. Pradhan, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 2) Mr. N. Behera, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 5) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 31.03.2026 Order No. 16 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Pursuant to order dtd.17.03.2026, learned Addl. Standing Counsel produced the order passed by the Sub-Collector, Kendrapara in Review Appeal No. 3/2025 along with letter dtd.30.03.026 with service of copy on the learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner as well as learned counsel appearing for the private Opp. Parties. The same be kept in record. 4. This Court taking into account the nature of order passed by the Sub-Collector, Kendrapara on 20.02.2026 in Review Appeal No. 3/2025, is of the view that unless and until the issue in the Review Appeal is decided in accordance with law, Petitioner cannot get the benefit as prayed for. Page 2 of 2. 5. Therefore, while disposing the writ petition, this Court grants liberty to the Petitioner to reiterate her claim, if she ultimately succeeds on the issue involved in the Legal Heir Misc. Appeal No. 1/2021 and Review Appeal No. 3/2025. 6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha