MAQSOOD BI AND OTHERS v. U T OF J AND K TH SSP POONCH AND OTHERS
CRM(M)/922/2022 · 2026-02-06
Rajnesh Oswal
body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 817 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 817 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CRM(M) No. 922/2022 CrlM No. 1897/2022
Maqsood Bi and others
…..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s)
Through: Mr. Abrar Ahmed Khan, Advocate.
vs
UT of J&K and others .…. Respondent(s)
Through: Mr. Eishan Dadichi, GA Mr. Mohd. Jahangir Khan, Advocate.
Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE
ORDER 06.02.2026
ORAL
1. Status report stands filed by the respondents, wherein it has been stated that during the course of investigation, Investigating Officer visited the place of occurrence and recorded the statements of the complainant and some of the eye witnesses and on the basis of the said statements of the complainant and the eye witnesses, offence under Section 498-A has been proved only against Zahid Ahmed Khan S/O Nazir Hussain i.e. petitioner No. 13, who happens to be husband of the respondent No. 3 and except him no offence has been established against any other person mentioned in the FIR.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has very fairly submitted that the present petition be disposed of and the petitioner No. 13 be permitted to raise all the pleas as raised in the instant petition before the learned trial court in the event charge-sheet is filed.
3. Ordered accordingly.
(RAJNESH OSWAL)
JUDGE
Jammu 06.02.2026 Sahil Padha
Whether the order is speaking: Yes/No.
Whether the order is reportable: Yes/No. Serial No. 22 Sahil Padha 2026.02.07 11:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document