Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jammu and Kashmir · body

2022 DAILYLAW 808 (JK)

RAKESH KHAJURIA AND OTHERS v. SACHIN KUMAR VAISHYA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER AND ANR

CCP(D)/16/2022 · 2026-03-30

Rajnesh Oswal, Wasim Sadiq Nargal

Contempt Petitionbody2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU CCP(D) No. 16/2022 c/w CCP(D) No. 1/2022 CCP(D) No. 3/2022 CCP(D) No. 17/2022 Rakesh Khajuria and Ors. …. Petitioner(s) Through:- Mr. Sanjay Kakkar, Advocate. Mr. Jatinder Choudhary, Advocate. Mr. Dalip Kumar Bangotra, Advocate. Mr. Mohinder Kumar, Advocate. V/s Sachin Kumar Vaishya, Deputy Commissioner and Anr. …..Respondent(s) Through:- Mr. Vishal Sharma, DSGI with Mr. Eishaan Dadhichi, GA. Ms. Monika Kohli, Sr. AAG. CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNESH OSWAL, JUDGE. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE. ORDER 30.03.2026 CCP(D) No. 16/2022 1. Mr. Sanjay Kakkar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the order stands complied with. 2. In view of the above, the proceedings in this contempt petition are closed. CCP(D) No. 3/2022 1. Mr. Dalip Kumar Bangotra, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the order stands complied with. 2. In view of the above, the proceedings in this contempt petition are closed. CCP(D) No. 17/2022 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the judgment has been implemented only in part but the compensation has not been disbursed to some of the petitioners. Sr. No. 11 2 2. Ms. Monika Kohli, learned Sr. AAG submits that the compensation could not be disbursed because the funds were not provided by the Government of India. 3. In view of the above, eight weeks’ time is granted to respondent nos. 3 and 4 to do the needful, failing which, appropriate orders shall follow. 4. List on 07.07.2026. CCP(D) No. 1/2022 1. Ms. Monika Kohli, learned Sr. AAG has submitted that communication dated 25.03.2026 is posing hindrance for implementation of the judgment passed by this Court, notwithstanding the fact that some of the petitioners in other petitions have been disbursed the compensation. 2. In view of the above, the respondent-Collector is directed to disburse the compensation in favour of the petitioners in accordance with the judgment. 3. Disposed of. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) (Rajnesh Oswal) Judge Judge JAMMU 30.03.2026 NEHA-1 Neha Kumari 2026.04.02 11:04 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document