Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2022 DAILYLAW 796 (ORI)

ARUNI KUMAR RAJHANSA v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/2730/2022 · 2026-03-10

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2022

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 2730 of 2022 Aruni Kumar Rajhansa ..... Petitioner Mr. B. Satapathy, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. P.K. Panda, ASC CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 10.03.2026 Order No. 06 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioner therefore, pray that the Hon'ble Court may be graciously pleased to: 1. Admit the writ petition. 2. Call for the records. 3. Issue Rule NISI calling upon Opp. parties to show cause as to why the petitioner should not be engaged permanently in his service and also to pay his arrear salary / honorarium and his present salary also and quash Annexure-8. AND 4. If the Opp. parties fails to show cause or show insufficient cause issue a writ of Mandamus /Certiorari or any other writ / writs, order/ orders, direction/ directions to Opp. parties more particularly to Opp. Party No.2 and 3 to release his arrear salary / honorarium and make his Page 2 of 2. service permanent anywhere in Biramaharajapur Tahasil in the district of Subarnapur and quash Annexure-8. And for this act of kindness, the petitioner, as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party No. 2 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party No. 2 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party No. 2 be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha