MUKHTAR AHMAD NATHKHAN v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT)
WP(C)/2410/2022 · 2026-04-07
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2022
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 796 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2022 DAILYLAW 796 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 11 Regular Cause List HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 2410/2022 CM(6089/2022)
MUKHTAR AHMAD NATHKHAN(SENIOR CITIZEN) ……...Petitioner(s) Through:
Mr. Masood, Adv. vice Mr. F. A. Bhat, Adv.
Versus UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K AND ORS. (REVENUE DEPARTMENT) .……Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Illyas Nazir Laway, GA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER 07.04.2026
1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner on 23.12.2025, and same was the position on 25.02.2026 as well. Mr. Masood, Advocate, appears as proxy counsel and seeks an adjournment, which is declined. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the instant matter.
2. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE
Srinagar 07.04.2026 Sakeena